Showing posts with label thriller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thriller. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2015

The Girl In The Spider's Web

Author: David Lagercrantz
Creator: Stieg Larsson
Translator: George Goulding
First Published: September 1, 2015
Series: Millennium #4

400 pages (hardcover)

I was kind of avoiding this book at first because it's not really by Stieg Larsson (who has passed away, sadly). I know this book was written based off of Larsson's extensive notes for future books in the series, so it's sort of by him, but not really. I don't know. Then one day, I saw it in the bookstore. I just decided, whatever. I'm going to read it anyway.

So in this fourth book, Mikael Blomkvist and Lisbeth Salander are baaaack. Sort of. Not together though. For like 99% of the book, they don't actually meet up, but they are in contact with one another.

Blomkvist gets a phone call one night from Frans Balder, a man who claims to have very important, scandalous information regarding a recent hacking job done to the American NSA organization. What makes Blomkvist interested is that the mysterious hacker sounds an awful lot like his old pal Lisbeth. But just as Blomkvist arrives at Balder's house, Balder is brutally murdered. The only witness is Balder's young son August, who was spared because he's autistic and mute. The murderer figures such a child is not going to be able to be a witness for the police anyway, and as the murderer does not really want to kill a child, he leaves him be.

Unbeknownst to the murderer, August is a savant. He has incredible photographic memory and is able to draw perfect, masterful drawings of scenes he has seen. Somehow, this information gets back around to the murderer, who is now understandably regretful that he let August live, as the police are now trying to get August to draw the murderer. It's up to Blomkvist and Lisbeth to step in and protect August, while at the same time figure out what it is that Balder wanted to expose about the NSA.

This book wasn't bad at all. I think this author tried very hard to mimic Stieg Larsson's writing and storytelling style, and in my opinion, he did a pretty good job. I didn't feel like any of the characters were "off" from the original or anything. Blomkvist felt like Blomkvist; Lisbeth was as badass as ever.

With the above said, this fourth book wasn't as great as the first three. I can't really pinpoint why. I mean, the story was interesting and since it was written based off of Stieg Larsson's notes, this story certainly felt like it belonged in the Millennium world. But I don't know if it's the fact that I know it's not written by Larsson or what (which I know is very unfair to this author). It just didn't captivate me in the same way the first three books did.

Maybe it's because Lisbeth seemed like a ... minor character in this book. I mean, it says right on the cover, A LISBETH SALANDER NOVEL. And yet, she's actually more a side character. Maybe that's why I didn't feel like this book lived up to the first three.

Anyway, it was a decent novel over all. It didn't have the power oomph that the first three did, but I liked it.

My Rating:

Monday, October 12, 2015

Dark Places

Author: Gillian Flynn
First Published: May 2009
Publisher: Shaye Areheart Books
349 pages (hardcover)

I read Gillian Flynn's other novel, Gone Girl, a year or two ago and I loved it. Loved the movie too. So I was pretty excited to start Dark Places as well, though I kept my expectations low because I never heard anything about this one before. Luckily, this novel is just as dark, creepy and amazing as Gone Girl.
Dark Places stars a 32 year old woman named Libby Day. When she was a child, her mother and two sisters were violently murdered in what was later known as the Satan Sacrifice of Kinnakee, Kansas. Libby was the sole survivor and her brother, Ben, was sent to jail as the killer. Libby testified against him.

25 years later, Libby's running out of money. She's never really held a job, instead, just living off of donations people gave her for being the poor, sweet girl with no family now. The thing is, she is no longer a poor innocent sweet girl. She's grown to be self-centered, uncaring and a bit of a kleptomaniac. Of course, now that she's 32, the murders are no longer on the forefront of anybody's mind anymore, and nobody's donated money to her for a long time now.

Looking for a source of money, Libby encounters The Kill Club, a group of people who are obsessed with real life crime mysteries (like serial killers and stuff). They are ecstatic to meet Libby (for a price, of course) and want to buy "memorabilia" off of her related to the murders. Motivated by money, Libby agrees to revisit some people in her past and see if she can dig up any new information about the night of the murders. As Libby half heartedly investigates, Libby begins to feel that perhaps her brother Ben isn't the murderer after all ... and that the murderer is still out there.

The best thing about this novel are the raw, damaged characters. Nobody is perfect in this book; in fact, most of the characters are downright unlikable -- on paper, anyway. Let's take the main character Libby for example. Sure, she's the victim of a heinous crime, but it's hard to feel much sympathy for her as an adult. She's rather dysfunctional as an adult, not knowing how to fit in society, stealing, taking advantage of people, etc. She just flits from one source of money to the next. And you know exactly why she's all messed up (troubled childhood, hello?) And yet, you are rooting for Libby to solve the mystery. You are rooting for her to come out of this victorious. Maybe reunited with her brother. I have to give kudos to the author for creating a character that on the outside seems so shallow but still manages to draw the reader into her world and make us care about whether or not she accomplishes her goals.

As for the actual mystery, I was definitely surprised at the end of the novel to discover 'whodunnit'. I was also a little let down because it was kind of an anticlimactic discovery, but maybe that's just me.

I am a big fan of Gone Girl and now, Dark Places as well. Safe to say I'll probably read anything by Gillian Flynn, haha. If you like mystery/crime/thriller types of stories with characters that are genuine and raw, read her books!

My Rating: 4/5

Friday, October 2, 2015

The Silkworm

This post first published July 12, 2014.

Author: Robert Galbraith (J. K. Rowling)
First Published: June 2014
Publisher: Mulholland Books
Series: Cormoran Strike #2
455 pages (hardcover)
 
This is book two of Robert Galbraith’s (pseudonym for J. K. Rowling, in case you have been living under a rock for the past year or two) mystery series about private detective Cormoran Strike. I hardly ever read mystery/crime novels, and I maintain, still, that they aren’t my preferred genre of books; however, after reading the first book in this series, The Cuckoo’s Calling, I’ve become a big fan of Galbraith’s/Rowling’s crime books. Probably because there’s just something “vintage” about the novels. Kind of reminds me of an old school private eye novel or movie, especially since this series takes place in London as well, and I really like that. With that in mind, there isn’t anything earth-shatteringly innovative about this book, but then again, I never expected it to be. Do be warned, however, that this second book has a lot more sexual/violent stuff in it than the first (due the nature of the way the victim was murdered, poor fellow).

In The Silkworm, Strike’s private detective business has picked up ever since he solved the Lula Landry case from book one. He’s got loads of clients now, and is almost out of debt. The unfortunate thing is, even though he has so many clients, they all mostly want the same thing: rich men and women hiring Strike to trail their spouses to see if they’re cheating on them, with whom, that sort of thing. Hey, but a paycheque is a paycheque right?

Then Leonora Quine comes into his office one day, asking Strike to please find her husband, who has disappeared. Her husband, Owen Quine, is an author of small fame but thinks he’s a bigshot. He’s just finished a manuscript for his latest novel, in which he includes many people that he knows in real life as unflattering and downright offensive characters. He’s full of drama and loves to disappear every once in a while to cause everyone to panic. However, Mrs. Quine says it’s been an awfully long time since he’s gone away this time, and she’d really like it if he could come back now. She can’t pay him, but she’s sure his agent will foot the bill for his services — Strike isn’t too sure about that, but agrees to take the case, since it’s something different from his usual tailing of cheating spouses, and surely this case wouldn’t take too much time to solve.

However, as Strike investigates Mr. Quine’s disappearance, he comes upon a startling discovery — the gutted corpse of the author. What’s worse, Leonora, Quine’s wife, is dragged away on suspicion of being the murderer, despite her denial. Strike is sure that Mrs. Quine is innocent though. Suddenly, this little side case isn’t so small anymore.

Like I said earlier, the traditional private eye tale that this novel undertakes is refreshingly familiar yet at the same time, exciting. I guess that’s the thing with mysteries — even if you’re using the same formula, your reader can be so driven by a strong desire to know the truth of the mystery that sometimes that’s all it needs to be engaging. Of course, I understand not everyone is going to feel the same way about that, but I found the novel charming and sort of like a throwback to classic private eye novels.

The book does employ the same general structure as the first one in its series — strings of interviews to various witnesses and persons of interests, back to back, followed by a grand reveal at the end by Strike to the cornered murderer. And like before, I enjoyed the interviews, but wished Strike did a little more sleuthing than simply talking to people. I am glad that that did, in fact, happen in this novel. There was a little more digging around to find clues, rather than rely solely on piecing together everyone’s statements. I was especially happy that Strike’s adorable assistant, Robin, got more of a role in his detective work this time around; she even participated in some of the risky things required to solve the case.

Speaking of Robin, I loved the budding relationship (or maybe, should I say, lack of one) between her, Strike and Robin’s fiance Matthew. Also, between Strike and his ex-fiancee Charlotte (again, should I say, lack of a relationship). Even though this is a detective novel and solving the crime is the main focus, I liked how Rowling fleshed out her characters so that they are more than “the detective” or “the secretary”. I’ve always thought Rowling does a great job with characterizations, and all the backstories, personal beliefs and dilemmas, and so on, that she’s given her characters really reinforces my belief.

I really love this series and I can’t wait to read the next book. I am doubtless that the third will also keep me up way too late at night.

My Rating: 5/5

The Cuckoo's Calling

This post first published July 8, 2014.

Author: Robert Galbraith (J.K. Rowling)
First Published: April 2013
Publisher: Mulholland Books
Series: Cormoran Strike #1
455 pages (hardcover)
 
I finally got around to it; I finally read J.K. Rowling’s (using pseudonym Robert Galbraith) new series, The Cuckoo’s Calling. I didn’t really know what to expect because on the one hand, I love the Harry Potter series, but on the other hand, her first adult novel, The Casual Vacancy wasn’t exactly stellar. Well, I always thought she did the “mysteries” in the Harry Potter universe pretty well, so I guess I should really say, I had some cautious optimism for this book. I just finished this book about 15 minutes ago, and I have to say, I really, really enjoyed this. Oh, it’s not without its flaws, but it did a pretty good job keeping me up late at night.

The book is about a struggling private detective named Cormoran Strike, whose life isn’t going so well. He lost a leg during the war in Afghanistan, his fiancee and him just broke up, he’s homeless and living in his office for now; oh and his business isn’t so well, so he’s up to his ears in debt. He can barely afford his temporary secretary, Robin, even though she’s very good at what she does.

One day, in walks into his office John Bristow, a lawyer. He needs Strike to investigate his sister’s supposed suicide, because he believes she didn’t kill herself, but rather, was murdered. To make the case more interesting, John’s sister just so happens to be the incredibly famous supermodel, Lula Landry. Strike is skeptical at first that this is actually a murder. He chalks it up to a bereaved brother who can’t handle the idea of his beloved sister killing herself. However, after John offers Strike a hefty amount of money for him to take on the case, Strike accepts. As he investigates the case, he comes to the realization that John’s right: someone did kill Lula.

Let’s start with the thing I didn’t like about this book first and get that out of the way. The entire structure of this novel is Strike interviews person after person after person, and near the end, obviously, fits the pieces together, confronts the murderer by monologue-ing to the murderer exactly how the murderer committed the crime, and voila, mystery solved. I did think it was rather boring of a structure, to just have Strike basically interview people for the entire book. I guess I was hoping for some sleuthing of some sort, where he would find himself searching for clues in places he shouldn’t be. Anyway, so there’s that, but luckily, I found all the interviews to be very interesting to read. I really do like the conversations Strike has with people. To sum up, I liked the content but not really how it was delivered.

What I really loved about this book was the characters. I have always thought J. K. Rowling has a wonderful way with characterization and I’m glad she continues this in this novel. The characters really came alive to me, they each had a memorable personality, and personal problems that really added to how the character felt and thought about things. My favourite was Robin, Strike’s secretary; I just picture this super keener whose desperate to please, she’s so funny sometimes. And of course, there’s Strike, who comes with so many personal problems that are left unsolved in this novel, I’m sure they will carry over into the next book (don’t worry, his personal problems are rather secondary to the main plot).

The best part was that this book successfully kept me wondering the “whodunnit” aspect of the mystery the entire time. I just had to keep reading to see who was the murderer! I figured it was probably going to the be the last person I’d suspect — and then I toyed with the idea that maybe it’s actually someone really obvious — regardless, I was surprised at the end at who the true culprit was. I enjoyed the tease and the mystery of trying to figure out who the murderer was (even though I do not think, as a reader, you could figure out the mystery on your own), but I have to say I’m actually kind of disappointed with who it is. I don’t want to spoil things, so I’ll just leave it at that …

All in all, a great book that I enjoyed reading. It’s a very classic kind of mystery, and I don’t read mysteries all too often. I look forward to reading the second book in this series!

My Rating: 5/5

India Black

This post first published June 28, 2014.

Author: Carol K. Carr
First Published: November 2010
Publisher: Berkley Trade
Series: Madam of Espionage Mysteries #1
296 pages (paperback)
 
I discovered this series via Goodreads’ “Readers Also Enjoyed …” recommendation section. The combination of a promise of exciting espionage by a femme fatale kind of character and the gorgeous cover had me persuaded to give the book a try. Also, I love the time period this book takes place in, during Queen Victoria’s reign.

Bizarrely enough, despite the word “mystery” being used to describe this book (it’s right on the cover!), it’s not a mystery novel at all. At least, I don’t think so … The story is about a woman named India Black who is a madam that runs a whore house in London, called the Lotus House. She becomes pulled into an international crisis of some sort when one of the clients of her establishment dies inside Lotus House. Said client is a pretty high ranking government official, who was supposed to be carrying a briefcase with top secret military documents that could be very detrimental to Britain should they fall into the wrong hands — such as Russian hands. India is forced/blackmailed by the Prime Minister of Britain and a government spy agent nicknamed French (real name is confidential) to help them in retrieving this briefcase that was stolen from the Lotus House. India becomes engaged in a cat-and-mouse chase with Russian spy agents as they both race to be the first to retrieve these documents.

If any part of it is a mystery, I suppose it’s when India was just trying to figure out who the gentleman was that died in her brothel, but that was solved very early on. I really don’t think this is a mystery at all. It’s certainly a thriller kind of novel though, and action oriented. Another thing about this novel that might throw you off is that the plot summary and even the cover of this book look “serious” and “cool”– however, it’s actually humorous. I read some reviews where people said the characters were kind of ‘idiotic’ and certain plot points is nonsensical or bizarre, in a “why the heck would they do that?” kind of way. I really think it is all intentional, as my impression of the novel is that it’s all meant to be sort of comedic. No, I don’t buy the reason why the British government would recruit a brothel madame to help them retrieve top secret documents and various other events in the book, but I never, for once, felt this was a serious, realistic espionage novel. So I was able to easily suspend my belief and enjoy the ride.

With all that being said, I actually found myself quite enjoying the story. Mainly because I found it funny. The plot is kind of predictable, but India’s wittiness, sarcasm and humor held my interest. And you know what, it was just a plain ol’ fun novel to read. It didn’t take itself seriously, and it was so easy to slip into the story.

I think the main shortcomings of this novel is that it was packaged all wrong (not really a mystery, looks too serious on the outside); as well, the official book premise includes a promise of India starting to develop feelings for the British spy agent French … but that never happened in the book!! To be fair, I did get a vibe that India and French were to be an item in the future, however, this vibe came from my own ‘intuition’, if you will, about how characters in such novels usually end up. I don’t think I could find much contextual evidence to support this vibe I have. I think there was only one scene where the two of them had a slightly meaningful conversation, but 99% of the time, they were just bickering at one another.

So, all in all, initial expectations from the book’s premise and book cover could be potentially disappointing, especially if you thought you were getting a certain story but really wasn’t. However, overall, a very fun book and a series that I would love to continue reading.

My Rating: 3/5

Casino Royale

This post first published November 23, 2012.

Author: Ian Fleming
First Published: 1953
Publisher: Penguin Books UK
Series: James Bond (Original) #1
192 pages (paperback)
 
Finally getting around to reading the classic James Bond novels. I’ve always liked the James Bond films (I haven’t seen all of them though) and have been wanting to read the novels but never really got around to it. With Skyfall‘s release, my interest was rekindled and finally, I finished the first book. Here’s hoping I’ll manage to read the other 11 books too!

I’ve seen the movie version of this before, a couple of times in fact. For those of you who wonder if they should read the book first or watch the movie — honestly, I don’t think it matters. The movie does follow the book pretty well, but due to the fact they take place in two different decades, the movie and book do have some differences too. Personally, I like the movie more but that’s probably because I’m much more of a visual person when it comes to action/thriller type stories, though I did really enjoy reading this original novel as well.

Casino Royale is where famous fictional 007 agent, James Bond, makes his debut. He is sent on a mission — to financially ruin a Soviet operative named Le Chiffre at baccarat so that SMERSH, the organization Le Chiffre works for, will force him to quit … or dispose of him. James Bond, along with the help of  his friend Mathis, an American CIA agent named Felix Leiter, and the beautiful Vesper Lynd from Section S back in London, Bond battles Le Chiffre at the card table with 50 million francs at stake. Bond and Le Chiffre’s luck and skill rise and fall, and several attempts are made on Bond’s life, which he manages to avoid — until Vesper is kidnapped and Bond is led into a torturous trap.

I really liked this book! First off, I just want to make it clear I have no idea what baccarat is. In the movie, they played poker. I barely understand poker, but I have a general idea of how it’s played. They play baccarat in this book and there are some lengthy passages about making the right move and wondering what the opponent will do and what cards he may have … that all went over my head. I skimmed those paragraphs, to be honest. However, really, you don’t need to understand baccarat to figure out what’s going on, and I don’t feel I missed much by skimming these paragraphs about baccarat strategies.

Anyway, to continue, you are dropped into the middle of Bond’s world. There’s some background information on the nature of his mission, but other than that, Bond doesn’t reveal too much about his own history or anything like that. I felt the beginning began kind of abruptly, but I quickly recovered from that. It’s really easy to read and it’s short too. Simple, very enjoyable.

I did notice Bond has quite the sexist attitude, which jumped out at me, probably because we’re in 2012 here and if anybody said the things he thought, well, they would be in for a telling. However, I do realize this book was published more than 50 years ago so the attitude is partly a product of the time. It’s also simply a part of Bond’s character. He’s self-sufficient and proud he can get things done on his own; he doesn’t feel he needs a woman helping him, and if he had one she would only slow him down. Granted, I didn’t think Vesper was that useless or weak, or anything like that, though she did get kidnapped. She’s described as quite intelligent. In any case, if you are a strong feminist who cannot overlook historical contexts of novels, then perhaps skip all the James Bond novels because I’m pretty sure Bond’s going to be like this in all of them.

People tell me that book-Bond is quite different from movie-Bond, except Daniel Craig’s version. From what I hear, Daniel Craig’s film version of Bond is the closest to book-Bond. In the movies, Bond is typically shown as a perfect, suave gentleman with classy, expensive tastes. I think this is especially true of the Sean Connery film versions. In this book, I did see quite a bit of that classy Bond. He’s not as suave, a bit rough around the edges, but definitely sophisticated. I think it’s interesting seeing the differences between book and movie portrayals, and I wonder if Bond will stay this way throughout the books, or if he will shift and change like in the movies.

My Rating: 3/5

Before I Go To Sleep

This post first published October 17, 2012.

Author: S. J. Watson
First Published: January 2011
Publisher: Harper Collins
358 pages (trade paperback)
 
I remember reading about this book on someone’s blog a long time ago. By chance I found it at a thrift store in pretty much brand new condition, so I decided to give it a go, even though I normally do not go for thrillers (lately, however, it seems like I have)! I ended up really liking it, though I do have a few gripes.

If you’ve seen the movies 50 First Dates or Memento, this book is like a mixture of the two, premise-wise. Before I Go To Sleep is about Christine Lucas, a woman who has a type of amnesia where she only remembers about 24 hours’ worth of events before they are forgotten. In essence, every day with a blank slate for life — she doesn’t know who she is, where she is, who the people around her are, and so on.

One day, Christine is visited by Dr. Nash, who tells her he has been meeting her in secret from her husband for weeks, trying to work on her memory problem. Of course, Christina has no recollection of ever meeting Dr. Nash but he gives her a journal and tells her to read it. It’s her journal, which she has been keeping for several weeks, with Dr. Nash calling every morning to remind her that she has a journal and where she has hidden it in her house. The journal is where Christine writes down bits and pieces of her history that she is able to remember or from other people telling her. Slowly, Christina begins to piece together the story of her life … but there is something odd about the stories she’s being told about her life. Did she really lose her memory in a car accident, or did something more sinister happen to her? Why did she and her husband never have children? Why has her best friend completely broken contact with her?

So I read some people are put off by this book before they even read it because the amnesia presented in this book is fake. Which is true. I did a bit of poking around on the Internet and indeed, there is no such condition as Christine’s that is in existence (which is the same condition presented in 50 First Dates, where they gave the false condition a false name, Goldman’s Syndrome. The amnesia in Memento is real though — great movie by the way, definitely check it out). I can understand why the fake condition would bother someone, I really do. It sounds too wild to be true. If you don’t want to read it because it sounds just too impossible, I think I understand your rationale. Myself, I was ok with the fake condition being the premise of the novel. It didn’t really bother me, and made for good drama in my eyes, even though I knew no such amnesia exists.

I found it very hard to put down this book. Once I began reading, I couldn’t stop. I had to find out the truth of what happened to Christine as much as Christine needed to know the truth as well. One of the fun things about thrillers/mysteries is coming up with a bunch of  ideas of what the answer to the mystery is. I had several and it was fun bouncing back and forth between my own theories of what will be revealed at the end of the novel, finding passages in the book to support one idea or another.
It’s definitely psychological as well. I know I am reading Christine’s diary, and many a time, I catch myself wondering how reliable Christine really is. If was unreliable at all, it wouldn’t be her fault though. She can’t remember yesterday or any day before that, so I did wonder how much I can trust what she is writing in her diary. Christine even wonders herself, at a few points during the story, if she can trust her own diary and what she has written in it. It led her to sometimes doubt herself and her entire reality, and she wondered who she was before she became this way. I like how the book explores memory and how important it is to a person’s identity and being. Without memory, who are we? For Christine, she feels like no one, like nothing, without her memories, and desperately wants to remember them.

With all that said and done, I did have a few of complaints with this book. Firstly, the vast majority of this novel is written in diary format, but Christine did not feel like she was writing a diary at all. It felt like … well, like a novel. The writing felt kind of monotonous, or robot-like, and kind of choppy too, as there were many short sentences in succession. It didn’t feel very personal the way diaries sometimes do. There were many things written in a way that I seriously doubt would be written by someone writing a diary. I understand for the purpose of the book, dialogue was written, but diary-writing people rarely include such descriptive dialogue like: “Where’s Adam?” I said. The words came out in a gasp. “Where is he?” Ben’s expression changed. Surprise? Or shock? He swallowed. “Tell me!” I said.” I mean, who writes like that in their diary? I don’t know about you, but when I used to keep one, I would never have been so descriptive as to say I gasped the words out and detailing my listener’s facial expressions and the fact he swallowed before I screamed the next thing. It read like a book. Which, I know, it is, but it should have read more like the diary it claimed to be.
My last gripe is the ending. It was fairly satisfactory but I felt it was quite predictable. It was one of my theories, and the one I brushed off because I thought that would be too obvious and cliche. Imagine my disappointment when I found out the idea I brushed off for being too predictable was actually the ending! I won’t delve too much into it for fear of spoiling the ending, but I thought I would just put it out there.

I don’t feel like my complaints ruined the book or anything though. I don’t think they are small issues, but I just remember being completely immersed into the story and staying up quite late reading it, always saying, one more chapter, one more chapter. To me, this book was clearly entertaining and I enjoyed reading it very much, which is why I opted to kind of overlook the flaws.

My Rating: 4.5/5

Gone Girl

This post first published October 12, 2012.

Author: Gillian Flynn
First Published: May 2012
Publisher: Crown
467 pages (eBook)
 
(As a warning, due to the nature of this mystery/thriller novel, this review has some slight spoilers. The first 3 paragraphs are spoiler free but after that it was hard to reflect on this book without revealing anything.)
I walked into this book knowing very little about what it’s about. It sounded sort of a like a murder mystery to me, which I don’t typically read (for no real reason; just not my thing), but Gone Girl is the October book of my friends’ book club so I cracked it open anyway. I ended up really liking this book a lot, and am completely blown away by the way the story developed. I loved how I couldn’t see any of it coming, and as the story progressed, I was more and more shocked.

Gone Girl is about a married couple in their mid-to-late thirties, Nick and Amy Dunne. They have been having a very rocky marriage for the past few years, and just when it seems like things can’t get even worse, Amy disappears. Amy is gone without a trace and no one has any idea where she has gone. This missing persons case quickly escalates to a possible homicide when the police begin gathering evidence that points to Nick as the culprit, the murderer. Nick is flabbergasted that anyone would think he murdered his own wife and asserts over and over again that he is innocent.

That is the basic beginning of this gripping thriller, and all I can reveal without giving away the spoiler bits. As the story progresses, the author throws plot twist after plot twist. While none of the characters were particularly likeable characters, I did find my allegiance flipping back and forth between Nick and Amy. Who’s really the “bad guy” here?! I love how the author (or characters) plays with the reader’s mind, psychologically. This is a rather unpredictable story, and I loved that about it.

The story starts off pretty realistically, in my opinion. It was interesting reading about Nick and Amy, two characters who come off as relatively normal at first. They have their quirks and are experiencing ups and downs in their relationship, not perfect people, but believable. You think, “This married couple can be any ol’ married couple.” As the story continues, Amy’s true personality came to light and I was very shocked at how quickly it escalated. To put it bluntly, I think she’s a psycho. At the end, I felt even Nick has gone a little loopy with what I think was a poor decision on his part. They both try to rationalize their thinking but I didn’t buy it — I just thought they both went insane. Or they always were and I never noticed till then. Overall, I liked the way the characters were written, but I feel like Nick veered off the path a little at the end. Amy makes sense, I suppose, even though it was shocking to go from normal to psycho so fast.

As for the ending, I think that was the most disappointing part of the story. For a story that did a great job building tension and intensity throughout the story, the ending was surprisingly flat and anticlimatic. I remember thinking, “That’s it? That’s what they decided to do at the end?!” I felt so unsatisfied with the ending. Perhaps the intention is to say marriage can sometimes be two people pretending to love another and going through the motions. I do feel like the ending had some sort of “message”. However, I just didn’t like it at all, it didn’t sit right with me, which is a shame because I liked so much of the book until the end. Perhaps it was just my sense of justice poking through as I felt neither character experienced much of a consequence from the events (well … except Nick, I guess, though he really chickened out in the end). I don’t know, I just wasn’t feeling the ending.

My Rating: 4/5

Dexter In The Dark

This post first published August 19, 2012.

Author: Jeff Lindsay
Series: Dexter #3
First Published:  2007
Publisher: Vintage Crime/Black Lizard
303 pages (paperback)
 
This is the third installment of the Dexter series, and while overall I enjoyed it and liked it, the new paranormal/supernatural elements added in this book threw me off and lessened my liking of it. I’m not saying crime or mystery novels can’t have supernatural elements to it. Just in this series, it feels horribly off. The first two Dexter books have established a world, a universe, of certain set rules, and 3000 year old gods weren’t a part of it. Dexter’s Dark Passenger was (I thought) a metaphor for the killing urges Dexter has. I mean, there just really wasn’t anything to suggest it was anything more than that. I didn’t expect the Dark Passenger to suddenly become a real thing.

In Dexter In The Dark, Dexter is in the midst of wedding preparations, trying to become a mentor to young Cody and Astor and of course, his dark hobby. When he is called to investigate a crime scene, Dexter finds his Dark Passenger retreating inside of him, as if it was scared, until one day, it simply disappeared. Even worse, someone or something is stalking him — the Watcher, it is called, which turns out to be a 3000 year old god that goes from one human host to the next. The murders that started all this get worse as well, as victims keep turning up all being killed in the same manner. Dexter feels the murders must be somehow related to the disappearance of his Dark Passenger but he hasn’t a clue.

As I already mentioned, this book threw me off. I didn’t expect the 3000 year old god thing to be literal, yet it was. I mean, if this wasn’t a Dexter book, I think it would be a fine, solid book, but it’s a Dexter book and paranormal elements were not a part of the first two. The whole time I was reading, I kept thinking, “Nah, there’s going to be some logical explanation at the end of the book that will explain everything” but it turned out the fantastical explanation was the explanation. It also feels like it cheapened Dexter, the character. The idea that he’s just a guy under demonic possession and not a serial killer just cheapens the whole thing. “Dexter’s really quite human! He’s just possessed by this demon thing!” Well, that is not the reason why I enjoyed reading about Dexter in the first place.

I know I’m making it sound like this book is horrible or something, but it’s really not. It’s just my one complaint about the book turned out to be a rather huge complaint, so it comes off that way. It’s a good, solid book, with good, solid entertainment, though even minus the supernatural stuff, it’s a bit lackluster compared to the first two books. Dexter furthers his relationship development with Astor and Cody, which is a huge focus of this novel, I felt. They have Dark Passengers of their own and Dexter is trying to become a sort of mentor to them, but the two kids just don’t listen to Dexter too well. The mystery is a little lackluster because it’s so intertwined with the ancient god thing, but still, I enjoyed reading about Dexter and Deborah attempting to solve the case anyway.

I think overall, this book is fine. It’s not great and quite unexpected, but it’s okay. I hope the next few Dexter books are more like the first two though.

My Rating: 3/5

Thursday, October 1, 2015

The Boy In The Suitcase

This post first published June 10, 2012.

Author: Lene Kaaberbøl & Agnete Friis
First Published: January 2010 (English: 11.2011)
Publisher: Soho Press
320 pages (ebook)
 
This is the June book of the bookclub my friends and I participate in. It was published into English not too long ago, and seeing how it was quite popular in its own country (I think it was originally a Danish book?) I wanted to give it a go. The only other Scandinavian crime thriller novel I’ve read is, of course, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, which I love, so I wanted to read more books like it.

The story is about — you guessed it — a boy in a suitcase. Nina is a bit OCD when it comes to people needing help — and her good friend Karin from when they were back in nursing school together, needs her help. Karin’s boss has asked Karin to pick up a suitcase from the train station, but Karin has enlisted the help of Nina instead. Nina goes to pick it up, only to find a naked, drugged, but alive, 3 year old boy inside! Believing her friend must have had a reason for not already calling the police, Nina decides to take the boy to Karin. However, Karin’s dead and Nina’s afraid the killer is going to come after her next. In the meantime, we also have the boy’s mother, Sigita, frantically trying to find out who has taken her little boy, and why anybody would want to kidnap him in the first place.

Right from the get-go, this book was an amazing, addictive read. I had no troubles at all staying engrossed in the plot, and I stayed up way too late trying to finish it (I think it was 4AM when I did!) It’s definitely a bit of a mystery novel, although you are not trying to find out who did what. As the reader, you are already quite aware of who’s who, and even the bit about Karin dying, well, they make it quite plain as to who committed that crime. The mystery element of it is not who the boy is either — that’s very obvious too. No, the mystery part is why one of the characters wants to kidnap that specific boy, and in finding that out, you have to piece together how everyone is related to one another. It’s a bit like solving a puzzle when you already have all the pieces; you want to find out what the big picture is. And it is quite a believable story! I mean, the chances of it actually happening might be a bit rare, but it could happen. I love that realism aspect to it.

I thought the characters were very brilliantly well done, especially Nina. You have to give a reason as to why any sensible person would not call the police when they find a drugged, naked boy in a suitcase, and would actually continue the favor they set out to do even when the friend dies! Nina can’t say no when someone needs help, so much that it’s actually almost like a psychological disorder and it completely cripples her family. I thought that was a good kind of “twist” to her character. She wants to be a hero, she gets ideas in her head of people praising her and telling her how appreciative and in her debt they are to her, so she grits her teeth and continues what she’s doing even if it may lead to a very dangerous, life-threatening situation. To do what she did, you need a character who’s not sensible, and Nina and her problem was perfect for it.

The writing was really great too, it was very easy to read. There was never too much of anything, like descriptions or characters mulling in their thoughts, which can be quite tedious to read if over done, but I thought this book did a great job balancing what needs to be said. Reading this book was like watching a movie in my head, and I loved every moment. Definitely recommend this book!

My Rating: 5/5

Dearly Devoted Dexter

This post first published May 10, 2012.

Author: Jeff Lindsay
Series: Dexter #2
Published: January 2005
Publisher: Vintage Crime/Black Lizard
292 pages
 
Reading this Dexter book was different from reading the first Dexter book, for me, because the second book (and all subsequent books in the series) are not the same as the TV show at all, which is what I am firmly acquainted with. So compared to the first book, I truly had no idea what to expect.

This second installment of the series has Dexter start off with trying to track down a nasty killer pedophile’s accomplice. Alas, it is very difficult being a serial killer when your intimidating work colleague suspects you’re up to no good and has begun stalking you 24/7. Thus, Dexter finds himself spending more and more time with his “disguise” — his girlfriend, Rita, in an attempt to show Sergeant Doakes that he’s really a very normal guy.

However, Dexter finds himself on the same side as Doakes when another serial killer has made his way into town. Deborah, Dexter’s sister, insists that Dexter help find this crazed killer. However, Dexter finds it difficult to keep up his end of the bargain when he realizes Doakes is on the killer’s list … and if Doakes is gone, Dexter would be free once again.

I definitely enjoyed this novel, particularly since I had no idea what to expect from my favourite serial killer (… that sounds so wrong, I know. He’s fictional though!) Once again, Dexter’s witty and clever remarks have won me over, and I thought the new main bad guy, that other serial killer, was quite interesting as well. I don’t want to reveal the ending, but when his motivations were revealed, I was like, “Ohhhh! It all makes sense now!” Really, I should have seen it sooner, but nonetheless, it was creative and great.

I found this novel moved a little slower than the first, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Just an observation. The first book flowed quickly, while this one takes its a time a little more, though it’s by no means a slow book. I think this allowed for more time for not only Dexter’s character to develop, but others such as Deborah and Doakes as well, who were really rather minor and flat characters from the first book.

There are two things that kind of bug me however. The first is a spoiler for the first book so skip this paragraph if you don’t want to know — in the first book, in the end, Deborah finds out that Dexter is a killer. I really dislike how this second book didn’t delve into this issue at all. Deborah is clearly a very law abiding cop who is determined to throw every criminal in jail. I just feel so dissatisfied that there was absolutely no discussion about Deborah knowing about Dexter’s dark side. The only time it was ever mentioned was when Deborah asked Dexter for help and kind of threatened him with, “I know what you are.” To me, I think she’s trying to ignore the fact she learned that her brother is a killer, but still, I would have thought something would have been talked about between the two. For example, Dexter could have said something like I tried to talk to Deborah about what she saw and heard that night but she pushes me away each time, so I conclude that she doesn’t want to talk about it, wants to ignore that part about me. That’s just a crude example, but you know … something.
The other thing I dislike was the epilogue. I also didn’t like the epilogue from the first book. I found them both too short and they don’t feel like they properly wrap up the loose ends. Almost like they’re hastily tacked onto the end.

All in all, I was really into this book, as much as I was into the first and I would be, of course, reading the rest of the series. Just can’t get enough of Dexter! I love the mysteries and it’s just such a neat angle to have a serial killer chasing down a serial killer. I do hope the epilogues improve though.

My Rating: 5/5

Darkly Dreaming Dexter

This post first published March 20, 2012.

Author: Jeff Lindsay
Series: Dexter #1
Published: July 2004
Publisher: Vintage Crime/Black Lizard
288 pages (paperback) 
 
Background: I’m a huge fan of the Dexter TV show. I have a large poster of Michael C. Hall portraying Dexter in my bedroom (a bloodless and not-creepy poster, which was a little difficult to find given the nature of the show). So obviously, since I love the show and I love to read, it was only a matter of time before I got my grubby little hands on the series. Which I recently did thanks to my mother, who gifted them to me as a birthday present. (Speaking of which, I really should do an IMM post soon). My point is — this review is probably a little bias, although I tried not to be.

With all that said, I did try to forget everything I know about the TV series while reading this book, although some comparisons will inevitably arise. Darkly Dreaming Dexter is about a guy named Dexter (duh). He’s a blood spatter pattern analyzer for the Miami Metro Police force on the outside … but on the inside, he’s a rather successful serial killer. But never fear, he only goes after bad guys; people who have killed other people.

Dexter’s life is going pretty okay. He’s kept up his cover as a normal human being for many years now. But there’s another serial killer in town and Dexter is, for once in his life, a bit frightened. Whoever this killer is, he’s copying Dexter’s killing style, and leaving some very strange messages for him. Friend? Or foe?

I swear I’m not intentionally being bias here, but this was a good book. It’s short, which obviously factors into the reason why I got through it in less than a day, but also, it is addictive and difficult to put down once you start.

It’s entirely in first person, so we’re inside Dexter’s head the whole time. Now, you might think it’s creepy being inside the head of a serial killer, but Dexter is a very interesting character, and for a serial killer, he really isn’t that creepy. He only kills bad people, and he recognizes that what he is doing is not socially acceptable so he isn’t psychotically trying to justify himself, which makes the reader feel a little less guilty about liking a serial killer character. And he’s very likeable. He’s got a wicked sense of black humour, and he (or the author, or both) loves alliteration. Oh, the alliteration! Dexter’s got some style there. I mean, come on, reading “very careful cold coiled creeping crackly cocked and ready …” is kind of cool. I think Dexter is what makes this book so interesting. I don’t read a lot of crime fiction (barely any) but I’ve always been under the impression characters in such books are usually the detectives chasing down the criminals. I like Dexter a lot because we’re inside the criminal’s head instead … though, being a part of the police force, he is still chasing down criminals. Criminals chasing criminals, who is going to come out on top? Love that.

Even if you’ve watched the TV show, you should try reading the book for sure. The first season was loosely based off of this first book (and subsequent seasons are not based off of any of the subsequent sequels, so this is the only one), so while there are similarities, some things are different enough that even I did not know what was going to happen, and thus, was glued to the pages. As a whole, the general plot is the same, but the TV show really expanded the book (which, like I said, is quite short) and changed a bunch of things. Some of the characters aren’t even in the same roles. I can’t really say which is better, the show or the book — I really love both of them.

Now, the ending of the book is considerably less conclusive, less well-done than the TV show. The ending is markedly different from how the first season of the TV show went, so everything that happened in the ending was a surprise to me. I liked the ending in general, but it was rather abrupt and I felt like it left way too many questions than answers. The epilogue also felt a bit rushed and too short.

I’m super excited to read the sequels though! Since they are completely different from the TV show at this point, I have no idea what to expect and I’m tremendously excited to find out ;P

My Rating: 5/5

The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet's Nest

This post first published March 16, 2012.

Author: Stieg Larsson
Series: Millennium #3
Published: May 2010
Publisher: Knopf
563 pages
 
I read book two 2 years ago, but recently watched the Swedish films (as well as the Hollywood version of book one). I was reminded that I still haven’t read book three and that it had, in fact, been sitting on my bookshelf for a little over a year now. I figured it was about time to finish the series.

Without giving too much away, book three focuses on the more political events that occurred as a result of book two. Salander is critically injured and lies helpless in the hospital. It is up to Mikael Blomkvist (that damn journalist again, as Salander would say) and various other allies of Salander to piece together the truth of what is really happening, and in doing so, they discover a massive political conspiracy, with Salander as the most unfortunate victim. Mikael and the others must try to figure out the entire story in time for Salander’s trial, where her enemies will try to have her locked away forever in an insane asylum if they can.

When I first started this book, I was a little surprised that I was not really as into it as I was the first two. I chalk it up to a number of factors — Lisbeth Salander, my favourite character, was out of the action and laying in the hospital for a good chunk of the plot; I have no idea how the intricacies of the Swedish government (or, any government, I guess) really work; and there were a lot of new characters introduced in this one, so it became a little difficult to remember who’s who sometimes. And there was just something I can’t quite put my finger on about the first half of the book or so. It wasn’t particularly engaging, I suppose. There wasn’t very much action, and I felt it was a lot of explanation, textbook-style, rather than a novel.

However, I have to say, the book did pick up tremendously after the halfway point — coincidentally (or not so coincidentally!) this was also when Lisbeth Salander was healthy enough to once again participate in the plot. And from that point on, I was reminded why I love the Millennium series and how it was made of sheer awesomeness. We got the crazy computer hacking again, we have people stalking people, people tailing people, people having sex with people, and people pointing their guns at people … It was thrilling again and I stayed up entirely too late finishing this book last night.
One of the final scenes, Salander’s trial, was my favourite of all. I was so in the zone while reading that, I couldn’t stop. It was one of those moments when reading where you had to keep reading, you had to find out what happens next. And I know, I know, there’s going to be those little nit-picky readers (hopefully very few of them) who will be like, “A real trial would never happen like that, yadi-yada.” Whatever, guys! I still think the entire trial was clever.

At the end of the book, I felt very satisfied with how things wrapped up. This book was really good, though it did feel a little weaker than the first two. A part of me wants to rate this a 5 just because it ended off so well in my opinion, but I think I will have to settle for the 4.5, because of the slow beginning. And some of the relationships, I felt, could have been handled a little better. For example, the mini plot with Erika’s stalker seemed unnecessary in the grand scheme of things, and primarily served as an awkward way to bring Lisbeth and Erika closer, in my opinion. There was also Mikael’s new relationship with Monica which totally had lots of potential but ended up with a wishy-washy, non-commitment kind of ending where you still have no idea what’s going on between them.

I digress. Point is, if you’ve read the first two books and plan on starting book three, you won’t be disappointed but at the same time, book three may not seem as good as the first two. Still, it’s really great and certainly memorable.

My Rating: 4.5/5

Battle Royale

This post first published October 2, 2011.

Author: Koushan Takami
Published: 1999 (English: 2003)
Publisher: VIZ Media
614 pages
 
I have been wanting to read this for a long time. I used to really be into anime and manga, and this title came up a lot as a bloody, graphic story of a bunch of students forced to kill one another. Then with The Hunger Games being released, I remembered this title again, mainly because I thought, “Wow, The Hunger Games sounds like it copied Battle Royale.” (To which I say, now that I have read it, it probably didn’t — the basic concept is the same, but the stories are completely different from one another. Anyway, I think Battle Royale is much better than The Hunger Games. I like THG, don’t get me wrong (I have it 5 stars and all), but I’m one of the people who really doesn’t understand the intense liking other readers have for it. I digress). I saw the movie first, but the movie isn’t exactly the most faithful rendering of the novel (great movie, just not the same as the book).

Battle Royale takes place in an alternate timeline in what used to be Japan, but is now the Republic of Greater East Asia. A class of 42 students are going on what they believe is a class study trip somewhere, but during the bus ride, sleeping gas is turned on and all the students are knocked out. When they awake, they find themselves on a tiny island and are told that they are this year’s chosen class to participate in the Program.

This immediately scares the daylights out of the students, and causes quite a few of them to become angry as well. The Program is, well, a program that selects, at random, one class a year to play a game where they are forced into a confined area (in this case, an island) and are forced to kill one another until one is left standing. This is the government’s way of controlling everyone — through fear and intimidation, a constant reminder that they have your lives in the palm of their hands. However, Shuya, our main character, does not want to play the game and instead, wants to strategize a way to escape. This proves to be most difficult because when the game begins, he cannot tell who is willing to play and who he can truly trust.

I loved this book. It was pure addiction to read it. As a warning though, there are many violent scenes in this book that make the violence in The Hunger Games look like a joke. Actually, I never really thought THG was a very violent book in the first place — I mean, Katniss nearly always does indirect attacks, or attacks that allow her to maintain a considerable amount of distance between herself and the enemy. In Battle Royale, we have in-your-face violence. I’m talking about bodies riddled with bullet holes, heads bashed into mush, etc. So if you can’t stomach that kind of stuff, this really isn’t the book for you so I won’t even try, but if you’re okay with it all, all the violence keeps you on the edge of your seat. It’s freaking scary because you don’t know who’s going to die next and you don’t know how it’s going to happen. And yes, some of the deaths made me squirm a bit.

Then there are all the relationships in the novel that made the novel extrenely intriguing. Okay, so I thought it was a tad odd that in one class, there was this huge web of love relationships. Half the characters seemed to have a crush on someone in the same class, which seemed like an oddly high amount to me. But these love relationships did pull on my heartstrings a bit in some scenes … especially the Hiroki scene near the end of the book. Oh, that was just so sad, and a harsh reminder that life is short so use your opportunities while you can.

There was also the trust-or-don’t-trust dynamic in the book. While I was placed in the perspective of many students in the game, a large number were shrouded in mystery. Even I did not know who to trust and who not to trust (okay, I lie — I watched the movie after all — but I know if I was completely brand new to the story, I would be very cautious of every character’s motives). You just don’t know who is pretending to be friendly, and who is playing the game for real. It’s kind of crazy how such a brutal situation reveals a person’s true nature. This was cause for some really eye-popping scenes (both literally and figuratively!)

Character-wise, I thought they were really well done. With 42 students and the instructor, it’s extremely difficult to go in depth with each character and flesh them out, so Koushan Takami didn’t do it. I believe I read somewhere once that he was completely aware that his characters are pretty one-dimensional. I’d have to agree with that, but at the same time, I think he gave great back stories to his main characters that do flesh them out a bit; only their motives are a bit one-track-minded, but hey, you’re in a survival game — you don’t really have too many other priorities at the moment besides living.

Even though it is quite a thick novel, the scenes go by quickly and the prose is easy to read. Now, with the prose, as an English speaker who has a basic understanding of conversational Japanese (studied it for 4 years and went on a student exchange trip thingy once to Japan — granted, my knowledge of the language is pretty rusty these days), I understand why some may not feel it is “good writing” because it does not sound 100% natural in the English language. However, when I think of how it may be said in Japanese, it makes perfect sense to me and does not feel weird in the slightest.
So I think I may have a bit of an advantage in regards to the writing, but honestly, everyone should know that it is difficult to judge the quality of a book’s writing when it is a translated piece of work. You can judge the translation (which I thought was fairly good), but that’s not the same as the intentions the author had when he/she was writing the book. At least, that’s my opinion. It’s the same thing with some of the behaviours of the characters. I think some of them won’t make that much sense to a person of the Western world, but if you have some basic understanding of contemporary East Asian cultures, particularly Japan of course, it would make a lot more sense and you’d realize it’s not really out of the ordinary for someone to say or do a particular thing.

Battle Royale is really a great book and makes for a thrilling read. I totally understand how it came to such popularity (and controversy!) in Japan and I am so glad that it was translated for English-speaking audiences to read and appreciate as well. If you are interested in this book at all, don’t hesitate to find a copy and read it! However, I don’t necessarily recommend reading this just because you read THG and kind of expect the same thing, because it’s VERY different and this book isn’t meant for everyone.

My Rating: 5/5

Double

This post first published September 15, 2011.

Author: Jenny Valentine
Published: February 2012
Publisher: Hyperion Books for Children
256 pages (galley)
 
I requested this book from NetGalley a while back, initially because I thought it was a science fiction book. I didn’t read the description, just saw the cover and I mistook the little water droplets as 01010101 computer language stuff. Anyway, turns out this is not a science fiction book at all! There’s nothing sci-fi, dystopian, paranormal, fantasy, etc. about it at all. But, even though the book was not what I expected at all, it turned out to be a really fantastic read and I enjoyed it tremendously.

Double is about a boy named Chap who has been homeless for the last few years, ever since his Grandad died and he ran away from his foster care parents (there were many). He ends up in some sort of children’s home, where the workers are astonished to discover that Chap looks exactly like a missing boy from two years ago, Cassiel. They ask Chap if he’s Cassiel. Having nowhere to go and nothing to lose, Chap says it’s him.

Chap, now called Cassiel, is introduced to his new family, which includes a mom, an older sister and an older brother. They more or less accept him warmly. However, Chap is bothered and somewhat haunted by the fact that he has stolen Cassiel’s life. He begins to wonder what happened to Cassiel. All his wondering leads him to discover that the happy little family he has joined isn’t as happy as it appears on the surface.

The beginning half was kind of slow to start. It wasn’t bad, but it could have been better.  The real meaty part of the story, the ‘thriller’ part, doesn’t happen until the halfway point when Chap starts wondering about the real Cassiel and starts discovering a bunch of suspicious things regarding Cassiel’s life. It’s not an action-type thriller, if that’s what you are thinking. This is more of a “Who’s the dangerous one?” kind of thriller, followed by Chap attempting to piece together what happened in Cassiel’s life before he disappeared. Unfortunately, I can’t really say why it got really good at that part without giving a big fat spoiler. If you like stories with family secrets, you’ll probably like this.
Chap is our first-person narrator, and I do wish he put a bit more emotion into his narrating. Even when he is speaking with the other characters, he doesn’t seem to have much feeling. Maybe it’s just the way his character is. I guess being homeless and tossed around the foster/social care system kind of deadened him a bit. In any case, I didn’t find him the most interesting, though I did find his back story incredibly sad and it was really easy to feel sorry for him.

Interestingly enough, Cassiel is described as having a rebellious and a bit of a mean-spirited personality, the complete opposite of Chap, so it was a little intriguing reading about Chap trying to pretend to be a person who is so different from him. As for the other characters, Helen, Edie and Floyd were both kind of ‘meh’ to me — they didn’t have very deep or interesting back stories and I think they could have been developed a bit more — but Frank was quite memorable. Even before Chap met him, I just got this vibe from Frank, and I knew he must be up to no good. However, since the reader is made to feel suspicious towards Frank from the beginning, Frank’s role in the story isn’t as shocking as it could have been.

I think my only real complaint would be that the mystery of why Chap appears to be Cassiel’s doppleganger is too predictable and easy to solve (it could be just me though). I won’t spoil it, but given the title of the book and the fact that this is not sci-fi or fantasy or paranormal or ‘strange’ in any way, it’s pretty easy to figure out. When it was finally revealed in the book, it did lose a bit of its punch, as I had already long suspected the reason. If you still can’t figure it out — well, then the twists in this story is definitely going to shock you!

Overall, this is a great book, good for a quick, suspenseful read, despite suffering from some predictability. And it’s got a nice message, I think: Even if you think your life sucks, there’s always someone out there who might have it worse than you. Chap’s life sucks, but taking Cassiel’s life doesn’t make him any happier — in fact, it put him grave danger! If you are interested in the story, I definitely recommend giving it a go, but by no means is this a must-read.

My Rating: 3.5/5

Brightwing

This post first published August 7, 2011.

Author: Sullivan Lee
Publisher: Self-published
Published: July 6 2011
289 pages (eBook)
 
I received this book from the author in exchange for a review. The author you may know under her real name Laura Sullivan, author of some published middle-grade and YA novels. She decided to go under a different name and self-publish for her first adult novel. I had no idea what to expect from the book. I don’t normally read books dealing with crime and whatnot, but I was pleasantly surprised by Brightwing, and would definitely read more works from this author.

The book centers around three characters, all of whom are criminals. Two of them are brothers, Edgar and Mallory Battle, who are pretty much America’s Most Wanted. The two are wanted for a string of robberies and murders (though in Edgar’s defense, Mallory did most if not all of the killing, due to him being somewhat mentally unbalanced). In order to shake the police off their trail, they decide to take a hostage in case they run into the police. When the brothers spot Lucy Brightwing off the side of the highway, trying to fix her car, they carjack her and force her to become their hostage.
Little do they know, Lucy is also a criminal and has millions and millions of dollars’ worth of uncut gems secretly stashed in her car, fresh from her own act of grand larceny. Slowly, Lucy outsmarts her captors and forces them to become putty in her own hands. But she did not expect that she will fall in love with Edgar Battle …

I really enjoyed the beginning of the story and the end of the story. The beginning and the end were jam packed with thrills and suspense. Despite the action, the book also focuses a lot on the characters’ and their backstories, and spends a lot of time building the relationship between Lucy and the brothers. Lucy in particular, is a very interesting character and not one that I’ve encountered much (if ever) in novels. I loved reading about her outsmarting the Battle brothers and similarly, it was fun reading about Edgar’s slow realization that the hostage they picked up is a lot more crime-savvy than him and Mallory.

Lucy is a really kick-ass character, and driven by the motivation to acquire lands for her Tequesta nation. Lucy is the last of the Tequesta Indians/Native Americans tribe, and the whole point of her performing her heist is to get enough money to pay for the sovereign land (and for the bribes she’d need to do to get what she wants). That’s something that’s really unique to me. I actually don’t know that much about Native American lands/reservations and things like that, so it was really great reading about new things like this. I really liked Lucy because even though she starts loving Edgar, she never forgets her dreams and herself. I can’t remember the exact scene, but there was one where someone asked if she was willing to give herself up to save Edgar, and she pretty much rolls her eyes, saying she wouldn’t be silly enough to do something like that. Haha, it was great — love is amazing, but I find myself respecting her because of it. She did only know him for a week, after all.

The part of the book I wasn’t too crazy about was the middle portion, when Lucy and the brothers hide out in the swamp. The story slows down a lot during the middle, with more focus given on Lucy and Edgar’s relationship. There was also a lot of description in the middle, such as when Edgar sees Lucy’s house for the first time and every little thing is described, from the wood of the floor to the wood of the walls and beyond. It felt a bit much. There was also some scenes dealing with some of Lucy’s ‘friends’ from her reservation (I believe) that were not as fun to read compared to the rest of the novel. However, like I said, the first-third and the final-third of the book is amazing to read.

Overall, I quite enjoyed this book, and I definitely recommend giving this book a try if you have the time! You can purchase it for your eReader here.

My Rating: 3.5/5

Uncommon Criminals

This post first published July 14, 2011.

Author: Ally Carter
Published: June 21, 2011
Publisher: Hyperion Book CH
Series: Heist Society #2
298 pages (hardcover)
 
If you’ve read my old review on Heist Society, the first book, back in August of 2010,  then you’d know that, while I thought the book was overall an awesome book, I also said the ending was a little disappointing because Kat and Hale’s relationship was just left hanging and we never figure out the identity of Romani. So I’d like to sort of preface this review by saying I had NO idea, at the time, that Heist Society was going to be a series. After discovering the existence of Uncommon Criminals, it has become clear that Kat and Hale’s relationship, as well as Romani’s identity, are part of an overarching plot of the entire series. My point is — scratch out what I said at the end of my Heist Society review.

Uncommon Criminals is book two of the Heist Society series. And I loved it! Love love loved it. This is one of those kinds of books where once I sit down to read it, I don’t get up from my seat until I’m done. I think it is even better than the first book. I had kind of expected the second book to basically be about another heist Kat pulls with her crew, and while Kat of course, does pulls a heist or two, the plot is not as straightforward as it was in book one.

Katarina Bishop is not an ordinary fifteen year old kid. She is a master thief, a part of one of the world’s best criminal families who have turned grand larceny into an art form. Unlike her family though, Katarina is not stealing masterpiece artworks for herself though. Katarina acts like a modern day Robin Hood, returning lost or stolen artworks to their rightful owners. After the events of Heist Society, though, Katarina has been pulling more and more heists — alone. She attributes her desire to pull more heists to the high she gets from stealing. When she is approached by a vulnerable old woman who asks her to steal the largest emerald in the world, the Cleopatra Emerald, because it was stolen from her family, Kat agrees, despite Hale telling Kat not to. Reluctantly, he helps her with this heist, along with Kat’s cousin Gabrielle.

Kat’s feeling great after helping the old woman out but her feelings quickly do a one-eighty when she realizes she’s been conned. Despite verifying the woman’s story, it turns out that woman had fed Kat a cock and bull story and that she is the real thief. Embarrassed at first, Kat doesn’t know what to do, but with the help of Hale and her friends and family, Kat is determined to steal the world’s most un-steal-able emerald … again. As Kat plots and plans, she realizes her adversary, this old woman, is not who she appears to be. She’s possibly the greatest con artist in the world and perhaps an even better thief than Kat.

It’s another Ocean’s 11-esque plot, but I personally found this one much more exciting than the first heist in the first book, even if a little predictable. The story moved at a quick, brisk pace; it’s thrilling and exciting and I was kept at the edge of my seat, figuratively speaking. The heist(s) are still as large scale as ever (and most likely completely implausible, but hey, it’s fiction). I was fully immersed into the story, and I can’t wait for more books to come out.

I did say Kat and Hale’s relationship wasn’t exactly resolved at the end of Heist Society, and it isn’t resolved in Uncommon Criminals either, but it does move forward. A little bit, baby steps. Kat and Hale’s relationship is one of my favourite things about this series … okay, admittedly, this is mainly because I think I am in love with Hale (whose first name we still don’t know and he still won’t tell Kat and I have a feeling we may simply never know. I am most definitely attracted to his mysteriousness). Still, I really love how Kat and Hale’s relationship isn’t carelessly slapped together, and isn’t based on something as superificial as looks (though I still imagine Hale as super hot in my mind); there is care in constructing it. And they’ve got a good backstory too.

Now, with all that said and done, I do want to point out that while you can most certainly read Uncommon Criminals without first reading Heist Society, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend. Yes, you will understand the plot and figure out who’s who pretty easily, but I don’t think you will fully appreciate the characters’ relationships and motivations. For example — Kat and Hale’s relationship. Or why Kat wants to return stolen items rather than continue the “family business” of stealing for themselves. These are things you don’t need to understand book two, strictly speaking, but I think you will be robbing yourself of the full experience of the book.

So, if you haven’t read Heist Society and Uncommon Criminals yet, go grab yourself a copy now! And if you’ve already read Heist Society but not Uncommon Criminals … well, what are you waiting for?

My Rating: 5/5

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

The 13th Hour

This post originally published September 11, 2010.

Author: Richard Doetsch
Published: December 2009
Publisher: Atria
336 pages (hardcover)
 
Nick Quinn is absolutely devastated when he finds his wife Julia dead, shot in the face, in their home. Worse yet, he gets hauled away by the police because they found the murder weapon with his fingerprints on it! Nick loves Julia more than his own life, and would do anything if it only meant she can be alive. Enter a mysterious European stranger, who hands him an antique gold watch, telling him that it will give him the power to go back in time, allowing Nick to attempt to solve the mystery of who killed his wife and why, as well as attempting to prevent it.

Time travel isn’t ‘straight-forward’ in this novel (if time travel can ever be thought of as a straight forward matter). The watch only allows Nick to go back one hour in time, for one hour; then he will go two hours back in time, stay there for one hour; then three hours … etc. (For example, it is 6:00PM, he goes back in time to 5:00PM. When it reaches 6:00 again, he goes back to 4:00. When it reaches 5:00, he goes back to 3:00, and so on and so forth). There aren’t “multiple copies” of Nick in time; when he goes back in time, that becomes the present time (so he doesn’t have to worry about running into himself from the past or anything like that).

Anyway, I thought this was an interesting take on time travel, although at first I wondered how much of the mystery he can really solve if he only has an hour at a time. While at first Nick doesn’t get much accomplished because he’s no detective and has no clue where to start, as he travels back further and further in time, he uncovers some startling corruption. Once he got on the ball, he was on a roll, although his actions sometimes — or rather, often — have unintentional consequences and many a time, Nick becomes frustrated that he messed things up to become even worse than they were before (for example, he gets other people killed. Whoopsie, Nick?) Sometimes I got a little mad at Nick and wanted to yell at him through the pages, “Why would you do that?”, hahaha.

I truly enjoyed reading this novel. It is hard to put down because every time you flip the page, Nick discovers something new, or does something that makes you wonder how it can affect the future, so I just had to keep reading to find out what the effects are. I personally just love books that deal with time manipulation. It really has a way of keeping you in suspense. In many ways, I think of this book as a mystery as well. Nick starts off not knowing a thing about his wife’s murder, only that she was obviously targeted, and somehow, he unravels the truth which has its roots pretty far down and away from what this normal suburban couple could possibly be involved in. It is also a fast paced book, which I deeply appreciated because I really dislike slow-moving plots. Reading this novel was like a refreshing breeze.

Of course, nothing is perfect. I found the author’s writing to be a little “philosophical” at times. He runs off into small tangents about the morality of time manipulation, or love (but mostly about time manipulation). This occurred a little too frequently for my liking, but it is usually short. The characters are all flat, one dimensional characters, but that didn’t really bother me too much since this is more about the plot than it is about characters. Another thing (which I feel is always a very important part of any novel … for obvious reasons) is the ending. While I was not unsatisfied by it, it just seemed to lack a bit of oomph. We have this fast, intriguing, clever plot … then the end just seems a bit anticlimactic. I don’t think the ending sucks exactly, just that it could have been better.

But with all that said and done, I really did find this novel to be exciting and entertaining. I would definitely read other/future works by this author!

My Rating: 4/5

Heist Society

This post originally published August 24, 2010.

Author: Ally Carter
Published: February 2010
Publisher: Hyperion Book CH
Series: Heist Society #1
287 pages (hardcover)
 
If you like stories about con artists and thieves in Ocean’s 11 style, then this is the story for you. It certainly entertained me; I think this book is brilliant and I’m really glad I plucked it off the library book shelf first, haha. (Admittedly, I was intrigued by the cover. It’s a pretty gorgeous cover)!
Fifteen year old Katarina Bishop is trying something new — boarding school. Prior to this, she has never been to school; instead, she had been traveling all around the world with her family doing ‘jobs’, ever since she was three. You see, Katarina’s family are professional thieves, stealing famous artworks, statues, jewels, and the like. But Katarina wants out and thus, conned her way into the best boarding school — her last con, of course. That is, until her dear friend W.W. Hale the Fifth (she (and the reader) never find out what the W’s stand for) took the liberty in getting her expelled from school so that she has to come back to the life. Kat’s father has been accused of stealing five of the most priceless paintings in the world, although for once he is actually innocent. Unfortunately, the victim of the crime is extremely upset, and is threatening Kat’s father’s life unless the paintings are returned. Thus, Kat is needed to plan one more heist job — stealing the stolen paintings — in order to save her dad.

I really loved this story, it was fun to read about Kat and her crew of thieves planning and preparing for the big heist job. It’s supposedly an impossible job because the real person who stole the paintings is even more talented in their profession than them and anyway, I just loved reading about how they get through various types of security systems, how they “borrow” equipment that they need, how they dress up in different identities in order to con information out of people. I love this kind of stuff, it was like this book was written for me! Stories with puzzles of some sort that need to be solved (in this case, how to break in to X place and steal Y) really intrigue me.

The only weird thing was that the crew, including Kat, are all supposed to be around fifteen years old, and I don’t know, I just have a really difficult time envisioning any fifteen year doing these things. Not to mention they just seem way too mature for fifteen (well, most of the characters). Wasn’t a problem though, I just kept imagining them as twenty-something year olds in my head, haha. I really, really loved W.W. Hale’s character (or just Hale, as he is called). First of all, he is sort of mysterious because you never find out what the W’s stand for in this name. Secondly, he is a billionaire whose parents are never home at all, and all he has is his old butler to keep his company, and I don’t know why but that sort of reminded me of Batman (???). Thirdly, he is witty, charming and good looking. He is actually not a thief per se, but he does co-operate with Kat and her crew and help them along (it’s always nice having a billionaire on your side). He and Kat met when Kat tried to steal something from his mansion years ago, I thought that was a cute story. It’s so obvious Hale likes Kat too. Ahh, I really love Hale …

A few scenes were a bit confusing if you read too fast (as I do all too often), but it’s all really exciting. The ending was a tad disappointing because there’s no ‘conclusion’ to Kat and Hale’s relationship and you never find out who stole the paintings originally (which felt like a huge let-down, as if as huge part of the story is just left unexplained) but if you exclude the ending, well, the rest of the book is fabulous.

My Rating: 4.5/5